![Vaping Business Accused Of Engaging In Illegal Cash-back Scheme](https://www.fairworkclaims.com.au/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2022/05/WEB_Vaping_Man.jpg)
Vaping business accused of engaging in illegal cash-back scheme
A vaping business has been accused of forcing a Chinese worker to enter into an illegal cash-back scheme.
Cash-back schemes involve an employer paying a worker their wages and then demanding they pay back some, or all of it, usually in cash.
Vaping business in court
Facing court is Easy Vaping Company Pty Ltd, which trades as ‘Easy Vape Distribution’ and ‘Easy Vape Australia’.
Also facing court is the company’s sole director Kate Chan, and her husband Edward Chan, the company’s operations and finance manager.
The Fair Work Ombudsman commenced an investigation as a result of receiving a complaint from the worker.
The Chinese national worked as a marketing specialist at Easy Vape’s Arncliffe premises between 2017 and 2020.
The company employed him on a 457 skilled work visa.
The cash-back scheme
It is alleged that several times after the worker received wages into his account, Mr Chan directed him to withdraw amounts ranging from $1,000 to $2,000 from an ATM.
Fair Work further alleges the company pressured the worker to comply with the cash-back scheme by threatening to withdraw its sponsorship of his 457 visa.
The total amount of wages Mr Chan allegedly made the worker pay back was $13,000.
Visa workers vulnerable
Industrial advocate Miles Heffernan said overseas workers are particularly vulnerable to wage theft.
“Some migrant workers might not know their rights, or they might have language barriers. Some are also afraid to complain because they don’t want to lose their visa and their chance to stay in Australia,” he said.
“That makes them easy to exploit, as has allegedly happened in this case.”
NEXT READ Hospitality
“Hello Juice penalised $277,000 for deliberately exploiting workers”
Penalties
Fair Work is seeking penalties against The Easy Vaping Company Pty Ltd and also Ms Chan and Mr Chan.
The company faces a penalty of up to $63,000 and Ms and Mr Chan each face a penalty of up to $12,600.
The Federal Circuit and Family Court has a directions hearing listed on 3 June 2022.
The company back-paid the worker in full last year after Fair Work commenced its investigation.
Please call our specialist team at Fair Work Claims today on
To connect with us, please follow us on
Fair Work Claims is a private consultancy and advocacy firm with no affiliation to any government agency, commission or tribunal.