skip to Main Content
Worker Coerced Into Dancing With Kylie Impersonator Sues Employer

Worker coerced into dancing with Kylie impersonator sues employer

A worker coerced into dancing with a Kylie Minogue impersonator at a work event is suing his former employer.

The man says the incident caused “nervous shock and psychological injury” and, as a result, he’s claiming $800,000 compensation.

Worker coerced into dancing with Kylie at work event

47 year-old Ian Billington worked as a business manager for fashion label Sussan.

He attended a national conference in regional Victoria in August 2015.

The event featured a Kylie Minogue impersonator performing at the company’s awards ceremony.

During the ceremony the impersonator twice called Billington on stage.

Billington alleges the performer and colleagues subsequently coerced him with “woo-hoos”.

Furthermore, he alleges colleagues physically impelled him to go on stage, despite him making it clear he did not want to.


LEARN MORE

WHAT IS WORKPLACE BULLYING?


Performer asked personal and humiliating questions on stage

Court documents allege the performer asked Billington “deeply personal and humiliating questions”, for example, his marital status.

She also asked questions about his wife, despite Billington being in a homosexual relationship.

Furthermore, the performer allegedly asked him “whether he liked to wear leather hotpants” and subsequently directed him to go backstage where a female dancer dressed him in clothing he described as humiliating and belittling. 

He subsequently returned to the stage where he was required to dance and sing.

Worker experiences panic attacks and agoraphobia

As a result of the incident, Billington claims he experienced a number of psychological injuries, for example:

  • panic attacks,
  • agoraphobia,
  • memory and concentration impairment,
  • sleep disturbance,
  • tremors and shakes,
  • tics and twitches
  • and also anger.

His claim also states:

“As a result of the said injuries the plaintiff has since only been able to work over the phone with limited face-to-face contact working a maximum of 18-hours a week.”

He is therefore asking the County Court to award him $800,000 special damages for lost past and also future income.

Employer rejects worker’s claims

In its defence, Sussan rejects Billington’s claims.

It argues he got on stage of his own volition and, to the extent that he may have been compelled, it was not reasonably foreseeable he would suffer a psychiatric illness.

The matter is listed for a directions hearing on March 5.

NOW WATCH:

Please call our specialist team at Fair Work Claims today on

1300 324 748

To connect with us, please follow us on

 


Fair Work Claims is part of the Supportah Network.

We are a private consultancy and advocacy firm with no affiliation to any government agency, commission or tribunal.

Get in touch with us

    First Name (required)

    Last Name (required)

    Organization

    Your Email (required)

    Mobile Phone (required)

    Your State

    Client Type (required)

    Matter Type (required)

    Tell us some more about your issue

    Back To Top